Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Decarceration Strategies: How 5 States Achieved Substantial Prison Population Reductions

FIVE KEY STRATEGIES AND PRACTICES THAT REDUCED PRISON POPULATIONS

  1. 1. Measures to Get Justice Reforms Underway and Maintain Momentum
    • High-profile leadership, bipartisanship and inter-branch collaboration (all 5 states).
    • Leveraging outside technical assistance and research findings on evidence-based practices (all 5 states).
    • Community engagement as a foundation of successful reentry and community reintegration (CT, MI, RI).
    • Pilots or staged implementation as innovation incubators (CT, MI).
  2. 2. Decreased Prison Admissions via Fewer New Prison Commitments
  3. Crime reduction helped in all 5 states – but reduced crime is no guarantee of less imprisonment.
  4. Reductions in criminal penalties or adjusting penalties according to seriousness (all 5 states).
  5. Elimination of various mandatory minimum sentences, sometimes retroactively (CT, MI, RI, SC).
  6. Creation or expansion of specialty courts and/or other alternatives to incarceration (CT, MI, MS, SC).
  7. Modifications of responses to at-risk youth to disrupt school-to-prison pipeline (CT, SC).
  8. 3. Decreased Prison Admissions via Reduced Incarceration for Failure on Community Supervision
    • Implementation of graduated intermediate sanctions for non-criminal violations (CT, MI, MS, SC).
    • Engagement with community service providers and employers before release from prison (CT, MI, RI).
    • State and local collaboration regarding case management and supervision (CT, MI, RI).
    • Greater focus on intermediate outcomes (CT, MI, RI).
    • Imposition of shorter terms of community supervision (MS, RI, SC).
  9. 4. Increased Prison Releases via Increasing the Feasibility and/or Efficiency Of Release
    • Incorporation of dynamic risk and needs assessment into justice processes (all 5 states).
    • Inclusion of releasing authorities in planning/implementation (CT, MI, RI, SC).
    • Expanded initiatives to overcome barriers to the feasibility of release (CT, MI, RI, SC).
    • Conditional release approval earlier in the process before eligibility for release (CT, MI, RI).
    • Feedback to releasing authorities regarding outcomes to build trust in reentry (CT, MI, RI).
    • Centralized reentry planning, trained specialists, and a goal of release at first opportunity (CT, MI, MS).
    • Simplified and/or expedited release processing especially when backlogs in processing (CT, MI, RI).
  10. 5. Increased Prison Releases via Requiring Less Time Served Before Eligibility for Release
    • Allowance or expansion of sentence credits through a variety of measures (CT, MS, RI, SC).
    • Reduction of criminal penalties even though still prison-bound (CT, MI, SC).
    • Modifications to sentence enhancements for aggravating factors (MS, SC).
    • Reductions in time served prior to eligibility for repeat paroles after revocation (MI, MS).
Citation

Dennis Schrantz, Stephen DeBor, and Marc Mauer
Decarceration Strategies: How 5 States Achieved Substantial Prison Population Reductions
The Sentencing Project
09/05/2018
https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Decarcerat…

Check out previous Environmental Scans

The National Institute of Corrections publishes this compilation of resources each year as an overview of what research indicates to be the trends in the corrections industry each year.
Accession Number: (2018) 033176, (2019) 033431, (2020) 033563, (2021) 033670, (2022) 033086, (2023) 033087