WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.049
understand the needs of the individual

2
00:00:02.190 --> 00:00:05.609
in order to help them become better and

3
00:00:04.049 --> 00:00:08.700
if we don't we can actually make them

4
00:00:05.609 --> 00:00:11.340
worse so Doug how do we go about

5
00:00:08.700 --> 00:00:13.019
determining an individual's risk well

6
00:00:11.340 --> 00:00:15.360
broadly speaking there are two ways that

7
00:00:13.019 --> 00:00:17.369
we assess risk one is clinicians use

8
00:00:15.360 --> 00:00:20.160
their professional judgment or their gut

9
00:00:17.369 --> 00:00:22.080
and another is to use actuarial risk

10
00:00:20.160 --> 00:00:24.269
tools that have actually been validated

11
00:00:22.080 --> 00:00:25.920
and they have items that are shown to

12
00:00:24.269 --> 00:00:28.890
predict greater risks of treatment

13
00:00:25.920 --> 00:00:30.449
failure and recidivism on average when

14
00:00:28.890 --> 00:00:32.340
clinicians follow their gut when

15
00:00:30.449 --> 00:00:34.410
providers follow their gut they are

16
00:00:32.340 --> 00:00:36.809
right about 50% of the time which means

17
00:00:34.410 --> 00:00:39.420
no better than flipping a coin when you

18
00:00:36.809 --> 00:00:41.399
use an actuarial tool they those tools

19
00:00:39.420 --> 00:00:43.110
tend to be right about 70% of the time

20
00:00:41.399 --> 00:00:45.450
so while not perfect they are

21
00:00:43.110 --> 00:00:48.450
considerably better and therefore the

22
00:00:45.450 --> 00:00:51.500
best practice is to use an actuarial

23
00:00:48.450 --> 00:00:51.500
based research tool

